Request a Rep Icon

COVERAGE
JUST IMPROVED

ZEPOSIA is now covered on Express Scripts as a 1L treatment with no step required for RMS.*

9 out of 10 commercial patients have access to ZEPOSIA with ~70% having 1st line coverage.

DATA ON BRAIN VOLUME AND COGNITIVE PROCESSING SPEED (SDMT)
in secondary, exploratory endpoints and
post hoc analysis2,3

View Endpoints

SAFETY COMPARABLE TO AVONEX IN OVERALL INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS,2,3b
and generally similar safety in the long-term extension study; 10 yearsc of experience4

See the Data
aStudy designs: SUNBEAM (1 year; N=1346) and RADIANCE (2 years; N=1313) were multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active treatment-controlled studies of daily oral ozanimod 0.46 mg (not approved for maintenance dose) or 0.92 mg oral daily dose vs weekly Avonex (interferon beta-1a), 30-μg intramuscular injection. Primary endpoint: ZEPOSIA reduced ARR vs Avonex by 48% at 1 year (0.181 vs 0.350, respectively) and by 38% at 2 years (0.172 vs 0.276, respectively). Secondary endpoints: ZEPOSIA reduced the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions by 48% at 1 year and by 42% at 2 years, and reduced the number of GdE lesions vs Avonex by 63% at 1 year and 53% at 2 years. 9 of 10 patients showed no confirmed 3-month disability progression. There was no significant difference in 3-month confirmed disability between ZEPOSIA and Avonex.1-3
bAdverse reactions: Overall incidence of adverse reactions for ZEPOSIA vs Avonex at 1 year was 59.8% and 75.5%, respectively, and at 2 years was 74.7% and 83.0%, respectively. Across 2 head-to-head trials, the most common adverse reactions with an incidence of at least 2% in patients treated with ZEPOSIA and at least 1% greater than Avonex, respectively, were as follows: upper respiratory infection, 26% (vs 23%); hepatic transaminase elevation, 10% (vs 5%); orthostatic hypotension, 4% (vs 3%); urinary tract infection, 4% (vs 3%); back pain, 4% (vs 3%); hypertension, 4% (vs 2%); and upper abdominal pain, 2% (vs 1%). Data are not an adequate basis for comparison of rates between ZEPOSIA and the active control. Severe adverse reactions: The rate of severe adverse reactions at 1 year for ZEPOSIA was 1.6% vs 2.2% for Avonex, and the rate at 2 years for ZEPOSIA was 3.5% vs 4.3% for Avonex. Serious adverse reactions: The rate of serious adverse reactions at 1 year for ZEPOSIA was 2.9% vs 2.5% for Avonex, and the rate at 2 years for ZEPOSIA was 6.5% vs 6.4% for Avonex.1-3 Please see the full Prescribing Information for additional SUNBEAM and RADIANCE data. See the "In Pivotal Trials: Incidence of Adverse Reactions" table in the Safety section for definitions of these terms.
cFrom the first patient randomized (October 18, 2012) through the DAYBREAK database lock (April 7, 2023), the maximum continuous exposure was 117.2 months. The mean exposure to ZEPOSIA 0.92 mg oral daily dose in the parent trials and DAYBREAK was 74.8 months.1,4
dIn ZEPOSIA pivotal trials SUNBEAM (1 year; N=1346) and RADIANCE (2 years; N=1313): ~30% of participants had previous experience with disease-modifying therapy, ~33% of participants were male, and ~30% of participants were above the age of 40.2,3
*Formulary data are provided by MMIT and Field Intelligence Input and are current as of November 2024.
Coverage criteria may apply. For most payers, prior authorization requirements include confirmation of diagnosis and prescribed by a specialist. However, different or additional criteria may apply. Please contact ZEPOSIA 360 Support™ for assistance.
1L=first line; ARR=annualized relapse rate; DMT=disease-modifying therapy; GdE=gadolinium enhancing; RMS=relapsing multiple sclerosis; SDMT=Symbol Digit Modalities Test.
Get your patients
started on ZEPOSIA
Patient
Start Form
Enroll your patients in ZEPOSIA 360 Support
and help them get started on treatment.
BMS eSign
Did your patient forget to sign the ZEPOSIA Start Form? Send them a link to the form below to sign electronically via CoverMyMeds.
Explore the safety profile
See the data in early RMS

This website is best viewed
using the horizontal display on
your tablet device.

This website is best viewed
using the vertical display on
your mobile device.